Keep in mind that section titles also act as anchors, which makes adding wikitext markup to them very problematic. It was removed on October 23, 2009, apparently with no discussion, and based on the revision summary is based on the misconception that placing links is no longer a problem. I've just readded the point about not placing links in heading titles. Graham 87 16:22, 24 October 2009 (UTC) Reply Icons without supporting text - input required Eubulides ( talk) 21:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC) Reply I don't have a problem with the removal of that text. Please feel free to revert if I overstepped. Graham 87 16:12, 23 October 2009 (UTC) Reply Kewl! In that case, does anyone have a problem with me adding a parenthetical "but not the current version" as a modifier? - 141.156.161.245 ( talk) 17:03, 23 October 2009 (UTC) Reply Probably best to just say "such as versions of JAWS prior to 7.1" – xeno talk 17:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC) Reply Done – Works for me! - 141.156.161.245 ( talk) 17:41, 23 October 2009 (UTC) Reply I dunno, from Graham says it's not a problem of practical importance nowadays, so I was bold and removed the prohibition. IIRC it ceased to be an issue around JAWS 7.1. – xeno talk 15:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC) Reply I'm on JAWS 8 now, which is the earliest version that most people would use these days. contribs) 15:36, 23 October 2009 (UTC) Reply Not quite sure what screenreader Graham is on, perhaps he could comment.Otherwise, the dilemma should probably be discussed in another forum to reach WP:CONSENSUS. If someone can document that it is not a problem for the current/recent versions, then maybe it should be redacted. There is currently a discussion at Template talk:PRODWarning#Linked article name in section headings that raises the question of whether or not this is still an issue, i.e., is it unique to legacy versions? I would rather not download and install this program just to test it, and then uninstall it. Some screen readers, such as earlier versions of JAWS, will stop reading the heading title when they encounter a link, and if the link is the first part of the heading title, they will only read the link text. Graham 87 10:10, 12 October 2009 (UTC) Reply Section headings and JAWS who became the Governer of Georgia after 1975), is spoken last. the earliest event is spoken first and the most recent event (i.e. I kinda like the current configuration as a mini-timeline though. But you're right, it would make more sense to have the office name and dates read first. Thisisnotatest ( talk) 06:43, 12 October 2009 (UTC) Reply As a screen reader user, I've probably just gotten used to it and I've never thought of the order as unusual. This would be a significant change involving thousands of pages so I'm putting it out for discussion. Which would be coded in the following sequence: "Governor of Georgia 1971 – 1975 Preceded by Lester Maddox Succeeded by George Busbee" "Preceded by Lester Maddox Governor of Georgia 1971 – 1975 Succeeded by George Busbee" While these tables are to be read in sequence, and therefore probably don't constitute a navigation issue for not having column headings, the sequence when read aloud is likely odd These are stated in the following sequence: For instance, is preceded by person x and followed by person y for several different public offices. On many Wikipedia pages, temporal sequences are generated as HTML tables with "preceded by" and "succeeded by" cells in each row. 65.1 Number in the first column of a data table controversy. 47 Accessibility table tutorial is coming.43 Rowspan and colspan, answer from an accessibility expert.42 Accessibility of the lists at the Missing Wikipedians page.38 Is my essay on accessbility suitable for music editors?.37 Following on fromWikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(accessibility)#Non_standard_ASCII.36 Table guidelines and highway articles.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |